![pester code coverage pester code coverage](https://i2-prod.cornwalllive.com/news/article1548948.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/Untitled-design.png)
If you are also using Invoke-Pester’s -PassThru switch, there will be a CodeCoverage property on the output object which contains the same information as what is displayed at the console.If you use Function, StartLine and EndLine are ignored. All 4 keys can be shortened to their first letter, if you prefer. The string assigned to the Function key may also contain wildcards. If you want to filter down the coverage analysis to just parts of a file (a particular function or range of lines), you can pass in a hash table instead. The keys to this hash table are Path, Function, StartLine, and EndLine (of which only Path is required). When passing in strings as paths, you can use wildcards:.There are a couple of other ways you can use the -CodeCoverage parameter: Here’s a short example of this new feature in action my sample 1 file fails to call one of the two functions at all, and only goes through one branch of the “if” statement in FunctionTwo:
![pester code coverage pester code coverage](https://info.sapien.com/images/Images/2016/testing-pester-code-coverage/image003.png)
psm1 files, specific functions within those files, or regions defined by starting and/or ending line numbers. Pester will use PowerShell’s built-in AST and breakpoint features to keep track of which commands get executed throughout the tests, and give you a report on which commands where missed. (Note: Unlike most of Pester’s functionality, using the Code Coverage feature requires PowerShell 3.0 or later.) Demonstration
![pester code coverage pester code coverage](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25097989/107485968-c5018b80-6b84-11eb-8e02-329dbf2dfba8.png)
By using Invoke-Pester’s -CodeCoverage parameter, you tell Pester which sections of code you are interested in checking for coverage. This can be entire. In Pester 3.0, we’ve added a feature to analyze code coverage while the tests are being executed.
![pester code coverage pester code coverage](https://nexusinno.com/wp-content/uploads/config-pester.png)
#PESTER CODE COVERAGE HOW TO#
When I started researching this topic, I found that there weren’t too many options available for PowerShell yet. The two examples that I found came from Lee Holmes and James Brundage: and, respectively. Both of these gave me valuable insights into how to approach this problem, but the output wasn’t quite what I wanted.
#PESTER CODE COVERAGE FULL#
One of the benefits of practicing Test-Driven Development is that you’re virtually guaranteed to have a complete suite of unit tests by the time the code is finished. However, what if you’re starting to work on someone else’s code which doesn’t have a full test suite? Or what if you’re like me (shame!) and didn’t write the tests and the code at the same time? That’s where a Code Coverage analysis tool comes in handy. It’s a tool which tells you how much of your code was executed by your tests. Part of the code I want to describe contains a scriptblock and would later be fed to a cmdlet Invoke-Command.I have a confession to make… I don’t actually practice TDD or BDD yet. I see the value of having unit tests, but I’ve been writing scripts for so many years now–most of that time without automated tests–that it’s been difficult to change my habits and get into that 30-second micro cycle of “Red-Green-Refactor”. I still tend to write pseudo code for a function and flesh it out from there, only writing tests when it’s basically done. Shame on me! I have been researching and reading articles to no success and I have decided to ask some help from you guys. I have been struggling a long time because of my pester not reaching 100% code coverage due to a scriptblock.